57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
18
6
5
4
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
6.1
4.7
4.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
91
47
146
158
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen