57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
3
4
4
2
24
Optimale Position
#6
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
3.3
12.0
2.0
2.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
91
40
111
48
302

Nass

Nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Handling - nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich