58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Sava Cargo 4 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Sava
Cargo 4
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
8
5
4
4
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
5.0
2.2
3.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
146
63
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
43%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Sava Cargo 4 Michelin e.Primacy Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk 2 Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Falken e.Ziex GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.