57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli Cinturato (C3) gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Pirelli
Cinturato (C3)
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
18
7
4
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.7
6.1
2.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
36
47
31
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen