57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
5
1
6
4
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#1
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.7
2.2
1.0
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
36
63
27
146
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen