57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
14
4
33
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#8
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
13.4
3.3
4.1
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
153
40
658

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen