57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
14
4
3
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#8
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
13.4
3.3
1.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
153
40
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen