57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
3
1
4
1
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.7
1.0
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
36
27
40
66

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich