57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
5
24
1
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
2.2
2.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
63
151
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schnee Slalom
Viking FourTech Plus
58%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking FourTech Plus
55%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen