57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
4
1
5
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
2.8
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
40
27
139

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich