57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kleber Quadraxer 3 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
13
3
24
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#4
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
6.3
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
116
36
151

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
73%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
81%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking FourTech Plus
58%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking FourTech Plus
55%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
89%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
89%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen