57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
24
5
1
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
2.7
2.2
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
151
63
27
Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Schnee Handling
Viking FourTech Plus
55%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
71%
Schneetraktion
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
76%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Schnee Slalom
Viking FourTech Plus
58%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen