57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
5
5
4
3
4
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
2.2
2.8
3.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
63
139
40
36
40

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich