57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Viking FourTech PlusBudget
VikingViking

FourTech Plus

5.6
R14 – R19
Hankook ION FlexClimateObere-Mittelklasse
HankookHankook

ION FlexClimate

9.0
R17 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
18
5
3
4
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
6.1
2.8
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
27
47
139
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best snow tyresBest tyres for evsBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.PrimacyHankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SHankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5Hankook Ventus Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Hankook Ventus Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen