57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
13
18
3
5
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
4.3
6.1
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
27
123
47
36
63
Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen