57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
5
18
3
4
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
2.8
6.1
1.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
139
47
23
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen