57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Viking FourTech PlusBudget
VikingViking

FourTech Plus

5.6
R14 – R19
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

8.5
R17 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
5
18
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
4.4
6.1
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2024
Verfügbare Größen
24
99
47

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste SchneereifenBeste reifen auf SchneeReifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Kumho Ecsta PS71Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Roadhawk 2Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Firehawk SportKumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Bridgestone Potenza SportGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcorunGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenDunlopGT

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich