57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
5
4
28
Optimale Position
#9
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
2.8
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
111
139
40
67

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich