58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Nokian
Powerproof 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
4
18
8
4
Optimale Position
#9
#6
#2
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
9.0
3.3
6.1
5.0
3.8
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
91
40
47
146
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
43%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.