57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
13
18
6
4
Optimale Position
#9
#6
#1
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
9.0
4.3
6.1
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
91
123
47
146
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen