57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Anzahl der Tests
5
14
3
Optimale Position
#11
#8
#5
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
13.4
7.3
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
153
59

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich