57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
6
5
4
24
Optimale Position
#11
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
4.7
2.2
3.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
146
63
40
151

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen