57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
4
15
24
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.1
3.3
9.0
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
47
40
226
151

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen