57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
5
23
24
Optimale Position
#11
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
3.3
2.8
3.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
40
139
176
151

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich