57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Hankook ION FlexClimateObere-Mittelklasse
HankookHankook

ION FlexClimate

9.0
R17 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Michelin CrossClimate 2Premium
MichelinMichelin

CrossClimate 2

9.1
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 UltraContact NXT WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
4
23
24
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
1.0
3.3
3.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
27
40
176
151

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -WinterreifenBeste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Auch vergleichen

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue HD PlusViking Fourtech vs Maxxis Mecotra 3Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue 4 SeasonViking Fourtech vs Laufenn I FIT LW31GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenDunlopGT

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen