57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Bridgestone Turanza 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Turanza 6

7.9
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
15
4
3
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
6.1
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
109
229
40
36

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenKumhoNokianNexenVredesteinContinentalGTMaxxis

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich