57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
18
13
4
3
5
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
6.1
4.3
3.3
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
109
47
123
40
36
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen