57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodride Solmax 11 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodride
Solmax 11
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
18
4
6
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
47
40
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodride Solmax 11
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodride Solmax 11
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodride Solmax 11
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Handling - nass
Goodride Solmax 11
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodride Solmax 11
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Goodride Solmax 11
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Komfort
Goodride Solmax 11
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodride Solmax 11
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Goodride Solmax 11
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Trocken
Goodride Solmax 11
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodride Solmax 11
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Goodride Solmax 11
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Kosten
Goodride Solmax 11
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Goodride Solmax 11
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen