57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
10
14
4
4
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
6.0
6.3
12.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
109
532
111
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen