57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
4
14
10
18
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.3
6.0
6.1
12.0
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
532
109
47
111

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen