57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
4
10
21
14
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#2
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.0
11.9
13.4
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
109
165
153

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich