57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
10
16
13
6
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.0
5.5
4.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2023
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
109
153
123
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen