57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
10
3
4
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
2.8
6.0
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
139
109
36
40

Nass

Nass
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Auch vergleichen

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SHankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5Hankook Ventus Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Hankook Ventus Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich