57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
14
18
6
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
3.6
6.1
4.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
194
47
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassfahrverhalten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen