Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Dunlop Winter gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Ecsta HS52

Winter

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

10

2

4

3

Optimale Position

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

6.0

1.5

3.3

3.7

Neuester Test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

109

66

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dunlop Winter

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Dunlop Winter

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dunlop Winter

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - quer

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Dunlop Winter

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kreisbahn nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Dunlop Winter

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Handling - nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Dunlop Winter

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Dunlop Winter

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dunlop Winter

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Dunlop Winter

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Dunlop Winter

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best tyres for evs Beste Trockenhandling reifen Beste Regenreifen Reifen mit bestem Handling Die Leisesten reifen Die günstigsten reifen Beste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Dunlop Winter vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Dunlop Winter vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Dunlop Winter vs Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Dunlop Winter vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Dunlop Winter gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

Winter

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Abmessungen und Preise

Rankings entdecken

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

Auch vergleichen

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen