57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Anzahl der Tests
10
18
14
16
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#8
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
6.1
13.4
5.5
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2023
Verfügbare Größen
109
47
153
153

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen