57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
14
18
4
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
6.3
6.1
12.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
532
47
111
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen