Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Auch vergleichen mit

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Testprofil

Fourtech

Ecsta HS52

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

5

10

1

5

Optimale Position

#11

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

17.0

6.0

1.0

2.2

Neuester Test

2021

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

32

109

27

63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass

Viking Fourtech

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Nassbremsen

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Kreisbahn nass

Viking Fourtech

55%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Handling - nass

Viking Fourtech

59%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - quer

Viking Fourtech

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - längs

Viking Fourtech

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Schnee

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Kosten

Viking Fourtech

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rollwiderstand

Viking Fourtech

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometerstand

Viking Fourtech

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

Viking Fourtech

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Trocken

Viking Fourtech

59%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Trockenbremsen

Viking Fourtech

47%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - trocken

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Beste Trockenhandling reifen Beste Regenreifen Reifen mit bestem Handling Die Leisesten reifen Die günstigsten reifen Beste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Viking Fourtech vs Maxxis Mecotra 3

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue 4 Season

Viking Fourtech vs Laufenn I FIT LW31

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Fourtech

Ecsta HS52

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Abmessungen und Preise

Rankings entdecken

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

Auch vergleichen

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen