Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Michelin
Primacy 4+

79%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

63%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 68%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 61%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 67%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 88%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 76%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 75%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 75%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. BFGoodrich Advantage A

BFGoodrich
Advantage

84%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

70%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 86%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 79%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

91%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

84%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 84%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 75%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 98%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 93%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. BFGoodrich Advantage C

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

76%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 91%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 84%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 75%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%