Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

73%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C