Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

5. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

5. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 67%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

80%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

73%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 76%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 67%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

67%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 60%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 71%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 66%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

5. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

95%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

71%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 73%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 63%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 93%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 83%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?