Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Michelin Primacy 5 Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Michelin Primacy 5 126

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Michelin Primacy 5 2x

1. Michelin Primacy 5 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Michelin Primacy 5 6.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Michelin Primacy 5 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. Michelin Primacy 5 2026

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

3. Falken e.Ziex 2025

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

1. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Michelin Primacy 5 Testsieger

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

1. Michelin Primacy 5 Empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Michelin
Primacy 5

65%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

62%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Falken e.Ziex 61%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 68%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 51%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

2. Falken e.Ziex 69%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 77%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Michelin Primacy 5 79%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Michelin Primacy 5 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Michelin
Primacy 5

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. Michelin Primacy 5 76%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

1. Falken e.Ziex 81%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 69%

1. Michelin Primacy 5 88%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin
Primacy 5

1%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Michelin Primacy 5 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

Michelin
Primacy 5

63%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 63%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Michelin Primacy 5 B

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?