Vergleich: Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

1. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Sehr gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

83%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

63%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?