Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

5. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 4.8

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2026

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

3. Falken e.Ziex 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. Falken e.Ziex Gut

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

5. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

87%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

68%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

63%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

38%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

75%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

5. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB