Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Beispielhaft

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Empfohlen

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

BFGoodrich
Advantage

75%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

73%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 71%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

68%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

84%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 93%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 76%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E