Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 14x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.33

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.36

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2026

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2026

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Beispielhaft

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Empfohlen

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

BFGoodrich
Advantage

75%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

73%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

68%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

84%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 93%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 76%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E