Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

3. Hankook ION Evo Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 23x

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.35

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Testsieger

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Gut

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook
ION Evo

66%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Hankook ION Evo 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

100%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Hankook
ION Evo

91.5%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Hankook
ION Evo

82%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

81%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E