Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Falken e.Ziex Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Michelin
Primacy 4+

81%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

72%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87.2%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

50%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

91%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 91%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

5. Falken e.Ziex ?