Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Budget-Reifen

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Beispielhaft

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Empfohlen

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 Zufriedenstellend

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

56%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 71%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 55%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

84%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 76%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 65%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Petlas
Imperium PT515

75%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

73%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 70%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 81%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 71%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

48%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 51%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%