Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

5. Firestone Multihawk 0

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

5. Firestone Multihawk 0x

1. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

5. Firestone Multihawk 0.

1. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

5. Firestone Multihawk 0.

1. Michelin e.Primacy 12

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

5. Firestone Multihawk 0

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Firestone Multihawk 2014

1. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk ?

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

5. Firestone Multihawk ?